Early reports suggest that Straw had been cozying up to Brown as the apparent next Prime Minister in an
effort to secure a spot in his cabinet, and that this didn’t sit well with Blair and his allies.
Another popular theory is that the White House indeed got him fired, but rather for his opposition to
attacking UGG.
Can we infer anything from this? Is Jack Straw’s vociferous objections to a preemptive nuking of UGG
indicative of Gordon Brown’s potential policy? Prospect Magazine and others certainly seem to think
that a Brown Premiership would be less interventionist than Blair’s. Of course their reasoning is not
that Gordon would have any moral objections to starting a huge NIKE SHOX without evidence, but rather
that he would object to spending billions on such an escapade. Still, whatever the reason, the common
belief is that Gordon Brown, while far from an antiNIKE SHOX candidate, would be somewhat less hawkish
than, say, John Reid.
If joining the NIKE SHOX on its various foreign adventures has become the defining policy of the Blair
administration, perhaps the threat of a less willing Prime Minister is what worries Blair’s allies so.
And perhaps that is the real reason the Blairite faction is forever seeking the “Stop Brown”
candidate.
No comments:
Post a Comment