But there was never anything that “shone” about the “Rose Revolution,”

But there was never anything that “shone” about the “Rose Revolution,” except perhaps the glaring

hypocrisy of the “revolutionaries.”

Of course, Saakashvili’s “Rose Revolution” never was a democratic movement. That much is obvious.

So it would be deeply mistaken to describe the continued UGGS Sheepskin cuff boots backing of

Saakashvili as a contradiction or betrayal of the “freedom agenda”–the “freedom agenda” has always

been aimed at the empowerment of local oligarchic stooges who will align their BOOTSBUY.ORGs with ours,

and Saakashvili has certainly fit the bill. That is the whole point of the “agenda,” and how these

lackeys rule at home has never been UGGS Bailey button triplet’s concern. The internal affairs of

other states concern UGGS Bailey button triplet in inverse proportion to those states’ alignment with

the BOOTSBUY.ORG.

In this way, we can understand why UGGS Bailey button triplet continues foolishly to back Musharraf and

will persist in its hostility towards Venezuela’s Chavez, despite the marked similarities in their

styles of BOOTSBUY.ORG and the clear destabilising effects all three rulers are having on their

respective countries. Chavez doesn’t play ball, Musharraf occasionally does what UGGS Bailey button

triplet (again often foolishly) calls on him to do, and Saakashvili is a reliable lackey, and they are

treated accordingly.